head-to-head — two names compared metric by metric

AAPL vs MSFT head-to-head

Side-by-side comparison across relative strength, alpha, beta, dividend yield, net margin and revenue growth. A winner is marked per row only where both names carry a value and the metric is directional.

AAPLvsMSFTAAPL wins 5 · MSFT wins 1
MetricAAPLMSFTWinner
Relative strength vs SPY RS+12.95+6.77AAPL
Annualized alpha vs SPY (2y daily) %/yr+10.92%+0.28%AAPL
Market beta vs SPY (2y daily) β1.030.93—
Forward dividend yield %+0.30%+0.75%MSFT
Net margin (latest FY) %———
Revenue growth YoY (latest FY) %———
Price vs 50-day MA %+4.85%+0.82%AAPL
% off 52-week high %-1.19%-6.78%AAPL
Days to cover (short) d3.362.73—
Max drawdown %
Measured over AAPL 503 sessions (2024-11-11 → 2026-11-12) · MSFT 503 sessions (2024-11-11 → 2026-11-12)
-33.43%-34.91%AAPL
52-week range percentile %ile96.3081.90—
Size & valuation context — not scored
MetricAAPLMSFT
Market cap—$3.9T
P / E (TTM, at the session close)—27.7×
EPS (TTM)—$19.15
Return on equity—33.2%

Sources: market data and fundamentals. Relative strength and alpha vs SPY, market beta (magnitude, not scored), forward dividend yield, latest-FY net margin and revenue growth, and price vs the 50-day MA. Winner marked only when both names carry a value on a directional metric; "—" indicates no value for that side. Maximum drawdown is measured over each name's own available price history; the window is printed on that row. Where the two windows differ, the row is not scored. Size and valuation rows are context and are not scored. 9 of 11 metrics comparable.