head-to-head — two names compared metric by metric

AAPL vs MSFT head-to-head

A real, side-by-side comparison across relative strength, alpha, beta, dividend yield, net margin and revenue growth. A winner is marked per row only when both names have a real value and the metric has a direction.

AAPLvsMSFTAAPL leads 4 · MSFT leads 4
MetricAAPLMSFTWinner
Relative strength vs SPY RS+11.66+5.11AAPL
Annualized alpha vs SPY (2y daily) %/yr+3.75%-7.38%AAPL
Market beta vs SPY (2y daily) β1.070.93
Forward dividend yield %+0.33%+0.72%MSFT
Net margin (latest FY) %+26.90%+40.30%MSFT
Revenue growth YoY (latest FY) %+6.40%+17.80%MSFT
Price vs 50-day MA %+6.19%+9.86%MSFT
% off 52-week high %-3.59%-8.95%AAPL
Days to cover (short) d3.533.18
Max drawdown %
Measured over AAPL 494 sessions (2024-09-13 → 2026-09-11) · MSFT 494 sessions (2024-09-13 → 2026-09-11)
-33.43%-34.91%AAPL
52-week range percentile %ile88.7075.80
Size & valuation context — not scored
MetricAAPLMSFT
Market cap$4.8T$3.7T
P / E (TTM)37.6×27.6×
EPS (TTM)$8.72$17.95
Return on equity137.2%33.2%

Real metrics from market + fundamentals data: relative strength & alpha vs SPY, market beta (neutral magnitude), forward dividend yield, latest-FY net margin and revenue growth, and price vs the 50-day MA. Winner marked only when both names have a real value on a directional metric; "—" means one side has no real value (never a fabricated 0). Max drawdown is measured over each name's own available real history — the window is printed on that row, and when the two windows differ the row is left unscored rather than handing the shorter history a win. Size & valuation rows are context and carry no winner by design. 11 of 11 metrics comparable.